Madras High CourtWP(MD)/5887/2017allowed

Arulmigu Sudalaimadasamy v. The District Collector

2017-06-07Honourable Mr Justice N. Authinathan,Honourable Mr Justice A. Selvam3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.06.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN W.P(MD)No.5887 of 2017 Arulmigu Sudalaimadasamy Nirvaga Committee, Puthoor, Pozhikkarai Post, rep. by its President, P.K.Soria Narayanan, No.46/2, P.K.S.Garden, Puthoor, Pozhikkarai Post, Dharmapuram Village, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

.. Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

2. The Divisional Engineer, Highway Department, PWD Road, Nagercoil,

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

4. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Agasteeswaram Taluk,

5. The Assistant Director of Village Panchayat, Nagercoil, Collectorate Campus,

6. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Union Office, Rajakkamangalam, Pazhavilai P.O., .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to implement the order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in O.Mu.No.Va4/51156/2016, dated 30.12.2016 within the stipulated time fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Sankar Prakash For Respondents 1 to 5 : Mr.M.Govindan, Special Government Pleader.

For Respondent No.6 : No appearance

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the concerned respondent to implement the proceedings dated 30.12.2016 passed in O.Mu.No.Va4/51156/2016 by the first respondent, by way of issuing a writ of mandamus.

2.It is seen from the records that with regard to removal of name board, the petitioner has given a representation to the first respondent and the first respondent has forwarded the representation of the petitioner to the fifth respondent. But the fifth respondent so far has not taken any action. Under the said circumstances, this Court is inclined to pass the following order. 3.In fine, this writ petition is allowed without costs and the fifth respondent is directed to take appropriate action on the basis of proceedings dated 30.12.2016 passed by the first respondent in O.Mu.No.Va4/51156/2016 within a period of one month. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(A.S) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To