S.Moorthy v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Moorthy ... Petitioner versus 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Batlagundu Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.Indrani ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus praying for a direction to the 1st and 2nd respondents to take necessary action on the petitioner's representation dated 07.04.2025 For Petitioner : Ms.M.R.Porkodi For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, 1 and 2 Additional Public Prosecutor 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the respondent police to register a case on his complaint dated 07.04.2025.

2.The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the 3rd respondent attempted to fence his land and it was objected to the petitioner. Therefore the petitioner was beaten up by the 3rd respondent on 23.03.2025. The petitioner has lodged the complaint on 07.04.2025 and has filed this petition. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submits that there is a civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent and therefore, they have treated the complaint as current paper enquiry.

2/4

4.Recording the above submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 17.06.2025 DSK Internet : Yes / No.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Batlagundu Police Station, Dindigul District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

DSK 17.06.2025 4/4