Arunpandi v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 03/06/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

1. Arunpandi, S/o.Marthupandi, No.19,Kamachiamman Kovil Street, Mela Anupandi, Madurai..

2. Arunraj, S/o.Kannan No.40, Thumatti Rengasamy Ayyarline, Munisalai, Boothapandy, Thovala, Madurai..

3. A.Govindraj, S/o. Alagar Samy, Plot.No. 14, Rajeswari Illam, R.V.Nagar, Atchampathu, Madurai..

... petitioners/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police.

Civil Supplies C.I.D, Madurai.

(Crime No.121 of 2026).

... Respondent/Complainant 1/8

For petitioners : Mr.S. Yogeswaran, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- C-33AB. For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.121 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/A2 to A4, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 6(4) of the Tamil Nadu Schedules Commodities (Regulation of Distribution by Card System) order, 1982 and Section 7(i)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, in Crime No.121 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 23.05.2026, the respondent Police along with 2/8

police officials were conducting regular check up and found that the petitioners and other accused persons had illegally transported 410 kgs of PDS rice using Ape van bearing Registration No. TN 57 V 9366. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they were falsely implicated in this case and they are no way connected in the above said incident. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that investigation is pending and the offences are grave in nature. He would further submit that the petitioners have no previous cases. Considering the grave nature, he opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

3/8

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioners and quantity of the materials involved in this case and also considering the fact that the petitioners have no previous cases and the materials were already seized and the material part of the investigation might have been completed and hence, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioners is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, 4/8

before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Madurai, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police once in a week ie., on Every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar nature.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioners shall not tamper 5/8

with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

(P D B J) 03.06.2026 vsg 6/8

TO 1.The learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police.

Civil Supplies C.I.D, Madurai.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

7/8

P. DHANABAL,J., vsg

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10012 of 2026 Date : 03/06/2026 8/8