← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17273/2018dismissed

R.Raja v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-09-27Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Seventh day of September Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.17273,17274 and 17304 of 2018 R.RAJA ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN IN ALLL PETITIONS Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUPPALAIKUDI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT IN ALL PETITIONS (CRIME NO.86 OF 2018) IN CRL OP(MD)NO.17273 OF 2018 (CRIME NO.84 OF 2018) IN CRL OP(MD)NO.17274 OF 2018 (CRIME NO.85 OF 2018) IN CRL OP(MD)NO.17304 OF 2018 For Petitioner : Mr.K.RAMANATHAN Advocate IN ALL PETITIONS For Respondent : Mrs.M.ANANTHA DEVI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) IN ALL PETITIONS PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 379 of I.P.C. in crime Nos.86, 84 and 85 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 07.09.2018 at midnight, the petitioner had stolen some water engine motors worth about Rs.15,000, 15,000 and Rs.10,000/- respectively. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case and only on the confession statement given by other accused, this petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit that the petitioner is a habitual offender and only on 07.09.2018

itself, he committed theft in three places and based on the confession statement given by the co-accused only, the petitioner has been implicated in this case.

5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner is a habitual offender, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6.Accordingly, these criminal original petitions are dismissed. sd/- 27/09/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUPPALAIKUDI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

PS/RR/SAR-4:05/10/2018:2P/3C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17273,17274 and 17304 of 2018 Date :27/09/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/