Senthil v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Eighth day of September Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.17305 of 2018 1 SENTHIL 2 RAJAM ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 2 & 3 Vs STATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TAMIL UNIVERSITY POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT IN CRIME NO.167 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : MR.M.MAHENDRA PRABHU Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Government Advocate (Crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 3(1), 4 (1), 5(1)(a) of IT (P) Act, 1956, in Crime No.167 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioners are having four previous in similar nature of offence.

3.Taking note of the previous antecedents of the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed.

sd/- 28/09/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TAMIL UNIVERSITY POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17305 of 2018 Date :28/09/2018 MSI/RR/SAR-I/16.10.2018-2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/