James Peter, S/O.Benjamin v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Eighth day of September Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.17380 of 2018 1 JAMES PETER 2 JOHN PETER 3 BASS RAYAPPAN @JOHN RAYAPPAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 2 to 4 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANNIVADI POLICE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

CRIME.NO.234 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.M.PITCHAI MUTHU Advocate For Respondent : Mr.M.ASOKAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 447, 427, 506(ii) and 379 (NP) I.P.C. in Crime No.234 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on the date of occurrence, all the accused persons had trespassed into the defacto complainant's agricultural land and damaged the plaints grown up in the filed. When the same was questioned by the defacto complainant, the petitioners assaulted the defacto complainant. Thereby, he sustained injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the investigation is pending.

5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul, Dindigul District and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 28/09/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, DINDIGUL.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANNIVADI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.M.PITCHAI MUTHU Advocate SR.No.18812 PS/RR/SAR-2:05/10/2018:2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17380 of 2018 Date :28/09/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/