Sundarsingh v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thuesday, the Twenty Seventh day of September Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.17307 of 2018 SUNDARSINGH ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PROHIBITION ENFORCEMENT WING, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT (IN CRIME NO.885/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.C.SUSI KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.V.NEELAKANDAN,Additional Public Prosecutor. PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody since 13.09.2018 for the offences punishable under Section 4 (1)(A) Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, in crime No.885 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 13.09.2018 at about 3.00 p.m., when the defacto complainant along with other were in surveillance, they found some unknown persons were ran away from a grocery shop and on enquiry, the came to know that the petitioner is selling liquor bottles purchased from Andhra Pradesh and Pondicherry and the police party seized 38 liquor bottles from the petitioner's grocery shop. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not involved any commission of offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the investigation is pending.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with certain

conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to the following conditions;

(i)the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rameshwaram. (ii) the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

sd/- 27/09/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMESHWARAM.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM ,RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PROHIBITION ENFORCEMENT WING, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, SUB JAIL, RAMANATHAPURAM.

5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.C.SUSI KUMAR Advocate SR.No.18448 PS/PN/SAR-4:28/09/20185:2P/7C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17307 of 2018 Date :27/09/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/