Madras High CourtWP(MD)/6347/2017partly allowed

M.Rajarajan, v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2017-04-10Honourable Mr Justice N. Authinathan,Honourable Mr Justice A. Selvam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.04.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN W.P(MD)No. 6347 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD)No.5007 of 2017 M.Rajarajan .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The Sub Inpsector of Police, Thiruverumpur Police Station, Thiruverumpur, Trichy District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the record pertaining to the impugned order of the 2nd respondent vide his proceeding No.Nil, dated 29.03.2017 and quash the same as illegal, consequently directing the respondents to give the permission and adequate police protection for conducting Adal Padal Dance Programme on 15.04.2017 in the eve of Chithirai Pongal Festival in front of Arulmigu Sri Pon Arasukatha Amman Temple belongs to Malaikovil, Thiruverumpur, Trichy District on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 29.03.2017.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Vadivelan For Respondents : Mr.K.Guru, Additional Government Pleader.

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the order dated 29.03.2017 passed by the second respondent and quash the same, by way of issuing a writ of certiorarified mandamus. 2.Mr.K.Guru, learned Additional Government Pleader, has taken notice for the respondents.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.It is seen from the records that the petitioner has given a representation for the purpose mentioned therein, but the second respondent has rejected the same by way of passing the impugned order dated 29.03.2017, wherein it has been simply stated that due to law and order problem, permission cannot be granted. The reason assigned by the second respondent cannot be accepted and therefore this Court is inclined to pass the following order. 4.In fine, this writ petition is allowed in part without costs and the impugned order dated 29.03.2017 passed by the second respondent is quashed. The second respondent is directed to look into the representation alleged to have been given by the petitioner afresh and pass suitable orders on merits within a period of two days. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(RTI) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The Sub Inpsector of Police, Thiruverumpur Police Station, Thiruverumpur, Trichy District.

+1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR NO.51374 +1 CC TO MR.T.VADIVELAN,ADVOCATE,SR NO.51115 smn MAS/MR/SAR2:13.04.2017:2P-5C W.P(MD)No.6347 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD)No.5007 of 2017 10.04.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/