K. Sathis, S/O.Kanagaraj v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Ninth day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.17358 of 2018 K. SATHIS ... PETITIONER/ SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PULIVALAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

(CR.NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.N.MOHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.V.NEELAKANDAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of I.P.C in Crime No.not known of 2018 seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to family dispute, the petitioner abused filthy language and attacked him and also threatened him. Hence, the complaint.

3.When the matter was taken up for hearing on 28.09.2018, the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit that petition enquiry is pending and hence, the matter was posted today for reporting compliance. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the enquiry has been conducted and a case in crime No.78 of 2018 for the offence under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of I.P.C. has been registered as against the petitioner.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 6.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 29/10/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TURAIYUR 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TRICHY.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PULIVALAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to MR.N.MOHAN Advocate SR.No.20594

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17358 of 2018 Date :29/10/2018 MSI/JC/SAR-IV/01.11.2018-2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/