Madras High CourtWP(MD)/17272/2019disposed of

S.Sudharsanan v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-08-07Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.17272 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.08.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P.(MD)No.17272 of 2019 S.Sudharsanan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Nazareth Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the second respondent in No.80/Mike/SK3 PS / 19 on 24.07.2019, quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and further directing the respondent No.2 to give permission and adequate police protection for conducting Aadal Paadal Programme in Pursuance of the Arulmigu Sudalai Madaswami Temple, Nazareth, Eral Taluk, Thoothukudi District on 15.08.2019 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 22.07.2019.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Viveka For Respondents : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to quash the order dated 24.07.2019 passed by the second respondent and consequently to direct the respondents to give permission and adequate police protection for conducting Aadal Paadal Programme in Pursuance of the Arulmigu Sudalai Madaswami Temple, Nazareth, Eral Taluk, Thoothukudi District on 15.08.2019 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 22.07.2019.

2. Heard both sides.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.17272 of 2019

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that seeking permission and protection to conduct Adal Padal Programme on 15.08.2019 in the above said temple, the petitioner made a representation on 22.07.2019 and the said request was rejected by the second respondent on the same day, without conducting any enquiry. Challenging the same, the present Writ Petition has been filed.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into the merits of the case, the petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation to the second respondent. On making such representation, the second respondent is directed to consider the same and pass suitable orders on merits and in accordance with law, forthwith.

5. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Nazareth Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

+1 CC to M/s.M.VIVEKA, Advocate ( SR-80273[F] dated 07/08/2019 ) W.P.(MD)No.17272 of 2019 07.08.2019 TA JM/14.08.2019/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2