Sahaya Divya v. The Sub Inspector Police
CRL OP(MD). No.11425 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 26/06/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD). No.11425 of 2023 Sahaya Divya ... Petitioner/Accused No.7 Vs The State Rep.by The Sub Inspector Police, Dcb Police Station, Tirunelveli (Crime No.4 of 2023).
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Angusamy.V, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.4 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A6, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 120(B) of I.P.C., in Crime No.4 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused had approached the de-facto complainant and his son stating that if they invests money in the first accused company, viz., JNF Trading, they would be given 10% interest for such deposit. Believing the same, the de-facto complainant and his son were jointly invest a sum of Rs.1.20 crores in the business of A1. Later, the accused neither return the deposit nor paid the interest. Hence, the case.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2
CRL OP(MD). No.11425 of 2023 3.Heard. Perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.
4.It is seen that there are totally 7 accused involved in this case and the petitioner is arrayed as A6. The petitioner is none other than the wife of A2. The modus operandi of the accused persons is that they collected money, in order to cheat, from the general public in order to do the same in the trading business in the name and style of JNF Trading in all over Tamil Nadu and also in the State of Karnataka. They collected huge money from the general public and looted the same. Insofar as the petitioner is concerned, in Tirunelveli District, she collected a sum of Rs.6 crores from the general public and likewise in the Thoothukudi District, she collected a sum of Rs.18 Crores from the general public and thereafter cheated them. Therefore, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is very much required in this case. That apart, the FIR was registered only in the recent time.
5.Taking into consideration the seriousness and gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, this petition is dismissed. sd/- 26/06/2023 / TRUE COPY / / 07 /2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
SJI TO
1. The Sub Inspector Police, Dcb Police Station, Tirunelveli.
2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to M/s.V.ANGUSAMY, Advocate ( SR-9604[I] dated 26/06/2023 )
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.11425 of 2023 Date :26/06/2023 RD (04/07/2023) 2P 4C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2