Amalraj v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Ninth day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.17494 of 2018 AMALRAJ ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.4 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, S.S.COLONY POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

CR NO.646/2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.C.SUSI KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.V.NEELAKANDAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 468, 471 and 420 I.P.C , in Crime No.646 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the first and second accused started SERO at Andrapradesh and offering jobs with the name of OG UGC and collected huge money from the victims. Thereafter, it is found that with the fake office, accused have cheated the public. Hence the complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is also one of the victim. He was appointed as Section Officer by the first and second accused and receiving a salary of Rs.18,000/- per month and he has no way connected with the allegations as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that there are totally 6 accused in this case. The first and second accused started fake office in the name of UGC, SERO at Madurai and Trichy and they are having regional office at Hydrabad. The petitioner herein is working as a Section Officer and collected huge money form the public and cheated them. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.It is seen from the records that the petitioner is also one of the victim and he has appointed as a Section Officer. The case of the prosecution is that the first and second accused started fake office in the name of UGC, SERO at Madurai and Trichy and they are having regional office at Hydrabad. The petitioner herein is working as a Section Officer, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30.am., for a period of two weeks, thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 09/10/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, MADURAI.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, S.S.COLONY POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.C.SUSI KUMAR Advocate SR.No.19305

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17494 of 2018 Date :09/10/2018 MS/PN/SAR-2/11.10.2018/2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/