Bairose Banu v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the First day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.17528 of 2018 1 BAIROSE BANU 2 MOHAMED IBRAHIM@SEEMAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO. 1 & 2 3 GANESH 4 SANGILI SETHURAMAN 5 NOOR MOHAMED ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO. NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ACHANPUDUR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT (CRIME NO.258 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : PORKODI KARNAN for M/S.POLAX LEGAL SOLUTIONS Advocate For Respondent : MR.V.NEELAKANDAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323, 506(i) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, in Crime No.258 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to the money dispute between the defacto complainant and the petitioners, the petitioners gave life threat against the defacto complainant. 3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Senkottai and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.
sd/- 01/10/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIFT CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SHENKOTTAI 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ACHANPUDUR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.POLAX LEGAL SOLUTIONS Advocate SR.No.18666
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.17528 of 2018 Date :01/10/2018 MSI/PN/SAR-I/04.10.2018-2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/