Karthik Sundaram v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 12/07/2024 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.A.NAKKIRAN Karthik Sundaram, ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs The Inspector of Police, K.Pudur Police Station, Madurai City.
Crime No. 318/2024.
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : MR.J.Sulthan Basha,Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.
PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No. 318 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 1/5
01.07.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 3(2)(a), 4(2)(c), 5(1)(d), 6(1)(b) of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 and Section 370 IPC in crime No.318 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 30.06.2024 at about 12.00 pm, on a secret information, when the police on raid, in Milano Saloon and Spa, it was found that the petitioner along with other accused doing brothel business in the place. Hence, the complaint.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and his name has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 01.07.2024, hence, he may be granted bail. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner is doing brothel business along with other accused in the Nila Spa saloon. He would further submit that the co-accused were already arrested and released on bail. Further, the investigation of the case is pending and hence, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of incarceration and that the co-accused already released on bail, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner on certain conditions. 2/5
6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai and on further conditions that; (i) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity; (ii)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; (iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness; (iv)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial.
v)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
vi)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
sd/- 12/07/2024 / TRUE COPY / 12/07/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.I /II /III /IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TRP TO THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI MADURAI.
DO THROUGH:
THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE K.PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY.
THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI.
THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
4/5
+1 CC to M/s.J.SULTHAN BASHA, Advocate ( SR-7846[I] dated 12/07/2024 )
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.10416 of 2024 Date :12/07/2024 PKP/12.07.2024/ 5P/7C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 5/5