P.Anbalagan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI P.Anbalagan ... Petitioner versus 1.The Inspector of Police, Natham Police Station, Dindigul District.

2.P.Meenakshi 3.S.Velu 4.K.Gunasekaran ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to provide police protection for fencing the petitioner's house property in Sy.No.159 / 13 A situated at Samuthirapatti Village, Natham Taluk, Dindigul District for an extent of 1.50 acres in patta No. 360 as per the complaint made by the petitioner dated 03.04.2025 and CSR No.395 / 2025 issued by the 1st respondent dated 05.04.2025. 1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.Ramalingam.K.C.

For R1 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner has made a representation on 28.02.2025 and on 03.04.2025 to the respondent police seeking police protection for fencing his land and has filed this petition for a direction to the respondent police to provide him police protection. 2.When this petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor on instructions submits that without any order of the civil court, the petitioner has approached seeking police protection. Considering the civil nature of the issue, they have conducted enquiry by treating the complaint as petition enquiry in CSR No.395 of 2025 and closed it on 05.05.2025.

2/4

3.Recording the above submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. The respondent police shall furnish a copy of the closure report to the petitioner. 17.06.2025 DSK Internet : Yes / No.

To 1.The Inspector of Police, Natham Police Station, Dindigul District.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

DSK 17.06.2025 4/4