Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/10771/2019dismissed

Vijaya v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-09-30Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos.10771 to 10774 of 2019 THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.09.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos.10771 to 10774 of 2019 Vijaya .. Petitioner/Accused No.4 in all petitions Vs.

1.The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, CBI/ACB, Madurai.

.. 1st Respondent/Complainant in all petitions 2.B.Sabapathy .. 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant in all petitions COMMON PRAYER: Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to the FIR Nos.RC/229/2019/A/0001, RC/229/2019/A/0004, RC/229/2019/A/0002 and RC/229/2019/A/0003 respectively on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same as illegal in so far as the petitioner is concerned.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gandhi For Respondents : Mr.S.Vijayan for R1 Special Public Prosecutor for CBI cases Mr.V.S.Karthi for R2 (In all petitions) COMMON ORDER These petitions have been filed by the petitioner to quash the FIR Nos. RC/229/2019/A/0001 to RC/229/2019/A/0004 on the file of the first respondent police, in respect of the petitioner is concerned.

2.It appears that the petitioner being an Advocate gave an legal opinion. But, she has been added as an accused in the cases registered by the respondent police, based on the complaint given by the Bank Manager, Andhra Bank, Trichy Branch dated 21.01.2019. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner has filed these petitions. 3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI Cases, Mr.Vijayan, submitted that the investigation in these cases has been completed and final https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos.10771 to 10774 of 2019 reports have also been filed and in the final report, the petitioner has not been added as an accused. The learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI Cases, also undertakes to file a memo to that effect.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the defacto complainant also admits that there is no defect on the opinion given by the petitioner herein.

5.Recording the submissions made by the learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI Cases, that this petitioner is no more as an accused in these cases, these criminal original petitions are dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TM Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Inspector of Police, CBI/ACB, Madurai.

2.The Special Public Prosecutor for CBI cases, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.R. GANDHI, Advocate ( SR-18812[F] dated 01/10/2020 ) Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos.10771 to 10774 of 2019 30.09.2020 SCR(CO) TR(14.10.2020) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2