Seenivasan v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.02.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Seenivasan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Chekkanurani Police Station, Madurai District.

3.Gurusamy Poosari ... Respondents PRAYER:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balamurugan For R1 & R2 : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute.

1/3

2. The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner would submit that the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 08.02.2024 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No dss To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Chekkanurani Police Station, Madurai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

2/3

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

dss 08.02.2024 3/3