Madras High CourtWP(MD)/17844/2016disposed of

A.Varathamuneeswaran, v. State Of Tamil Nadu,

2016-09-20Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.09.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE S.VIMALA W.P(MD) Nos.17844 of 2016 A.Varathamuneeswaran ... Petitioner -vsState of Tamilnadu, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai.

... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to take action of the petitioner's representation dated 06.07.2016 seeking to regularize his service as Work Inspector Grade-II from 01.07.2002 similar to others in the light of the G.O.Ms.Nos. 680 dated 16.08.1995, 680, 788 dated 01.06.1992, 193 dated 30.03.1999, 297 dated 14.09.2007, 140 dated 14.05.2010, 392 dated 19.06.1998, 193 dated 30.03.1999, 286 dated 13.12.2005, 297 dated 14.09.2007 and order passed in W.P.No. 27265 of 2005 order dated 08.03.2006 and W.P.No.7197 of 2008 dated 27.01.2011. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Venkatesan For Respondent : Mr.M.Alagadevan Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to take action on the petitioner's representation dated 06.07.2016 seeking to regularize his service as Work Inspector Grade-II from 01.07.2002. 2.Heard Mr.M.Venkatesan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.M.Alagadevan learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondent. By consent the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.According to the petitioner, he joined as Mazdoor Grade I on 26.06.1991 in the respondent Department and the petitioner has

completed 10 years of service as Work Inspector Grade II. Even though the services of the similarly placed persons were regularized after completing 10 years by issuing several Government Orders, the case of the petitioner has not been considered so far. Hence, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 06.07.2016 seeking regularization of his service as Work Inspector Grade II from 01.07.2002. As the representation has not been considered so far, the present writ petition has been filed.

4.It is agreeable for the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 06.07.2016 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5.Accordingly, the respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.07.2016 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CSI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar mj To The Principal Secretary, The State ot Tamilnadu Public Works Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai.

+1cc to Mr.M.Venkatesan, Advocate Sr.No.53731 JAM/24.10.16/SKS-RR/2P-3C W.P(MD)No.17844 of 2016 20.09.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/