Y.Shahul Hameed,(Staff No.A31528) v. Dr.J.Radhakrishnan,Principal Secretary To Govt.
CONT.P.(MD)No.971 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.12.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN CONT.P.(MD)No.971 of 2019 Y.Shahul Hameed : Petitioner/Petitioner Vs 1.J.Radhakrishnan, Principal Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.
2.Baskar, Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation Ltd., (SETC), Pallavan Salai, Chennai.
3.Ponmudi, General Manager, State Express Transport Corporation Ltd., (SETC), Pallavan Salai, Chennai.
4.Venkatraj, Administrator (In charge), Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002.
:Contemnors/ Respondents (1st Respondent was deleted vide high Court order dated 13.12.2019) PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnors / respondents in accordance with law for their willful disobedience of the order in W.P.(MD)No.993 of 2019 dated 21.01.2019.
Prayer in WP(MD). 993/ 2019 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to revise the petitioners Grade Pay in the month of October, 2013 based on the G.O.No.61 Transport dated 30.4.2015 and further directing the respondents to pay the petitioner the difference amount in his salary for the month of October, 2013 and to pay difference amount in his retirement benefits including monthly pension, gratuity, leave salary, dearness https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
CONT.P.(MD)No.971 of 2019 allowance, commuted value of pension and all other attendant benefits payable to him together within a reasonable rate of interest.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj For R2 and R3 : Mr.K.Sathyasingh For R4 : Mr.A.Swaminathan
ORDER
This contempt petition has been filed complaining disobedience of the order of this Court made in W.P.(MD)No.993 of 2019 dated 21.01.2019.
2. Mr.K.Sathyasingh, learned counsel for the second and third respondents would submit that the order, dated 21.01.2019 made W.P. (MD)No.993 of 2019 has been complied with. He has also produced the proceedings of the General Manager of the first respondent Corporation, which discloses that the order has been complied with and the benefits have been granted to the petitioner.
3. In view of the same, this Contempt Petition is closed as nothing survives.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar () // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ta +1 CC to Mr.K.SATHIYA SINGH, Advocate(SR-106214[F]dated 20/12/2019 ) +1 CC to Mr.A.SWAMINATHAN, Advocate ( SR-106242[F]dated 20/12/2019 ) CONT.P.(MD)No.971 of 2019 20.12.2019 VB(21.01.2020) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2