Madras High CourtWP(MD)/7437/2017disposed of

D.Nesamani v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2017-04-21Honourable Mr Justice S.S. Sundar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.04.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR W.P.(MD).No.7437 of 2017 D.Nesamani ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by the Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2. The Director of Elementary Education, The Directorate of Elementary Education, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.

3. The District Elementary Educational Officer, The District Elementary Educational Office, Raja Street, Town Hall, Coimbatore 641 001.

4. The District Educational Officer, Pollachi Circle, Pollachi 642 001, Coimbatore District.

5. The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, The Assistant Elementary Educational Office, Vaalparai Division, Pollachi Circle, Coimbatore District.

6. P.U.M School, Selaliparai (East), Valparai, Coimbatore District .. Respondents PRAYER : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 25.11.2014 and reminders submitted there under for appointing her any suitable post on the compassionate grounds within the time frame that may be fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Mahendran For Respondents : Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan, Additional Government Pleader.

O R D E R

This Writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 25.11.2014 and reminders submitted there under for appointing her in any suitable post on the compassionate grounds within the time stipulated by this Court.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

3. Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the Writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

4. Having regard to the limited scope of the prayer in the Writ petition, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's case, this Court is inclined to issue the following direction:- "The respondents 1 to 3 are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 25.11.2014, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."

5. Accordingly, the Writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To