← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/13500/2020allowed

S.L.Bright v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-12-14Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13500 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13500 of 2020 1.S.L.Bright 2.Vasantha Bright ... Petitioners Vs.

1. The State represented by, Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

(Cr.No.74 of 2011)

2. Sundar ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for records in C.C.No.4 of 2018 on the file of the Special Court for Land Grabbing Cases, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District and to quash the same on the ground of compromise. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Senthil Sankaranatha Kumar For R1 : Mr.V.Neelakandan, Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.S.Ragaventhre

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the charge sheet in C.C.No.4 of 2018 on the file of the Special Court for Land Grabbing Cases, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 2.The second respondent / defacto complainant, as well as the petitioners/accused are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter has been amicably resolved between themselves and the second respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the complaint and therefore, the petitioners would pray for quashing the charge sheet in C.C.No.4 of 2018 on the file of the Special Court for Land Grabbing Cases, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District 3.The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties along with their respective counsel are also personally present before this Court, today(14.12.2020) and the defacto https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13500 of 2020 complainant has represented before this Court that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who was present in the Court, had also verified their identity and would state that he has no objection for the above compromise.

4.In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the charge sheet in C.C.No.4 of 2018 on the file of the Special Court for Land Grabbing Cases, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District, is quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) gns Enclose: Xerox Copy of Joint Comprise Memo Note In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned. To

1. The Judge, Special Court for Land Grabbing Cases, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to Mr.K.PARBHU, Advocate ( SR-23799[F] dated 03/12/2020 ) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13500 of 2020 14.12.2020 KVN(CO) CS(22.12.2020) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2