A.Thangavel v. The Superintendent Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.04.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN W.P(MD)No.7456 of 2017 A.Thangavel .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Sayarpuram Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the rejection order of the second respondent dated 17.04.2017 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant permission and protection for Innisai Kacheri Program perform by Nellai Pugal Geetham Groups Film Innisai Kacheri in "Kodaivizha" scheduled to be held on 26.04.2017 at 09.00 p.m. at Arulmigu Sri Ariyanachiamman, Sri Uchimahaliamman, Sri Mariamman Thirukovil at South Street, Kattalangulam Post, Sayarpuram Via, Thoothukudi District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 17.04.2017.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Karthic Rajan For Respondents : Mr.K.Guru, Additional Government Pleader.

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the order dated 17.04.2017 passed by the second respondent and quash the same, by way of issuing a writ of certiorarified mandamus. 2.Mr.K.Guru, learned Additional Government Pleader, has taken notice for the respondents.

3.It is seen from the records that the petitioner has given a representation for the purpose mentioned therein, but the second respondent has rejected the same by way of passing the impugned order dated 17.04.2017, wherein it has been simply stated that due https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

to law and order problem, permission cannot be granted. The reason assigned by the second respondent cannot be accepted and therefore this Court is inclined to pass the following order. 4.In fine, this writ petition is allowed in part without costs and the impugned order dated 17.04.2017 passed by the second respondent is quashed. The second respondent is directed to look into the representation alleged to have been given by the petitioner afresh and pass suitable orders on merits within a period of two days.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi

2. The Sub Inspector of Police, Sayarpuram Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

+1cc to M/S.R.KARTHIK RAJAN, Advocate SR.No.53218 +1cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No.53583 ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.7456 of 2017 JM/SKN RSK/SAR 2/24.04.2017/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/