← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/18032/2016disposed of

A.Shankar, v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-09-21Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.09.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P(MD)No.18032 of 2016 and WMP.(MD).No.12994 of 2016 A.Shankar

...Petitioner

vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Town Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Joint Director of Health Services, Sigil Raja Veethi, Ramanathapuram Town, Ramanathapuram District.

5.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to break open the seal affixed in the petitioner's physiotherapy clinic namely Muthalamman Clinic situated at D.No.196/2-374, M.S.Agraharam, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District by considering the petitioners representation dated 15.09.2016.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondents : Mr.K.P.Krishna Doss Government Advocate

O R D E R

The writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to break open the seal affixed in the petitioner's physiotherapy clinic namely Muthalamman Clinic situated at D.No.196/2-374, M.S.Agraharam, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District by considering the petitioners representation dated 15.09.2016.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Mr.K.P.Krishna Doss, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

3. Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner would be satisfied if the direction be issued to the fourth respondent to consider his representation dated 15.09.2016.

4. Heard the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents and perused the records.

5. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, without going to the merits of the case, the fourth respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.09.2016 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No Costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AE) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai-23.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Town Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Joint Director of Health Services, Sigil Raja Veethi, Ramanathapuram Town, Ramanathapuram District.

5.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

+1cc to M/s.M.S.Jeyakarthik, Advocate in SR.54577 W.P(MD)No.18032 of 2016 21.09.2016 pjl PBK/SK-SKN/SAR-III 22/09/2016 ::2P-7C: (IT) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/