← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/11613/2023allowed

Manickam v. The Inspector Of Police

2023-06-28Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.06.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

1. Manickam

2. Chinamuthu

3. Kamal Prakash

4. Anbalagan ... Petitioners Vs

1. The Inspector of Police, Thuraiyur Police Station, Tiruchirappalli District. Crime No.404 of 2012.

2. Ramachandran ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying this Court, calling the records pertaining to Cr.No.404 of 2012, dated 08.10.2012, on the file of the first respondent Police and quash the same as against this petitioners.

For Petitioners : Mr.K.Sivabalan For R1 : Mr.B.Nambiselvam Additional Public Prosecutor 1/5

For R2 : Mr.E.Balasubramanian

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned FIR in Crime No.404 of 2012 on the file of the 1st respondent police. 2.The contention of the petitioners is that based on the complaint lodged by the second respondent, the first respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.404 of 2012 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324, 506(ii) IPC.

3.The further contention of the petitioners is that they compromised the issue with the 2nd respondent amicably. A joint memo of compromise was filed, which has been duly signed by the petitioners and the 2nd respondent and also by their respective counsels. 4.The petitioners and the 2nd respondent appeared before this Court along with their counsels and also produced their Aadhar cards. They were also identified by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and the Investigation Officer.

2/5

5.Both the parties, who were present before this Court, were enquired by me and they accepted the terms of compromise. Hence, the Compromise Memo is recorded.

6.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and also in view of the joint compromise memo, dated 27.06.2023, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending and inclined to quash all further proceedings in Crime No.404 of 2012 pending on the file of the 1st respondent police in respect of these petitioners. 7.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the entire proceedings in Crime No.404 of 2012, pending on the file of the first respondent police is hereby quashed in respect of the petitioners. The compromise memo is recorded and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part of this order.

28.06.2023 NCS : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes/ No PNM 3/5

To

1. The Inspector of Police, Thuraiyur Police Station, Tiruchirappalli District. Crime No.404 of 2012.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

G.ILANGOVAN, J.

PNM ORDER IN 28.06.2023 5/5