← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/18140/2016disposed of

R.Nandhini, D/O.N.Raja, v. Branch Manager,

2016-09-22Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.09.2016 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Writ Petition (MD) No.18140 of 2016 R.Nandhini ...

Petitioner Vs.

1.The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Karanthattankudi Branch, 508, Kurunji Road, Near New Bus Stand, Thanjauvr 613 007.

2.The Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Main Branch, Opposite Government Hospital, Thanjavur 613 001.

3.Lead District Manager, Indian Overseas Bank of India, Karups Tower, Medical College Road, Thanjauvr 613 007.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to forthwith sanction and disburse the Education Loan for undertaking B.Sc.

Nursing Course by sanctioning the sum of Rs.4,84,000/- (Four Lakhs and Eighty Four Thousand only) within such time as may be granted by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Srinivas For Respondents : Mr.Pala.Ramasamy

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for the issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to sanction and disburse education loan for undertaking B.Sc.Nursing Course for a sum of Rs.4,84,000/- (Four Lakhs and Eighty Four Thousand only). 2.Heard Mr.P.Srinivas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.Pala.Ramasamy, learned Standing Counsel who takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.The petitioner said to have filed an application for educational loan before the first respondent but the first respondent refused to receive the same. Hence, the petitioner has submitted an application before the third respondent who in turn forwarded the same to the first respondent by order dated 22.08.2016 which is still pending. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed for the relief stated supra. 4.When the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that they will consider the application of the petitioner as per the IBA guidelines and pass orders.

5.In the above circumstances, the first respondent is directed to consider the application of the petitioner dated 22.08.2016 and pass appropriate orders on merits within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T&P) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar +1cc to M/s.P.Srinivas, Advocate SR.No.54763 +1cc to M/s.Pala.Ramasamy, Advocate Sr.No.55226 sms sm:AAl-MPA:SAR I:23/09/2016:2P/3C Writ Petition (MD) No.18140 of 2016 22.09.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/