← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17696/2018ordered

T. Muruganandham v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-10-04Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fourth day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH CRL OP(MD) No.17696 of 2018 1 T. MURUGANANDHAM 2 M. SNEGAVALLI 3 V. MUTHU 4 M. KAMATCHI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUVADANAI POLICE STATION, TIRUVADANAI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.140/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.N.PRAGALATHAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.V.NEELALAKANDAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506 (i) I.P.C and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, in Crime No.140 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioners assaulted the defacto complainant, abused her with filthy language and also threatened her with dire consequences. Hence the complaint.

3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 04/10/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF, CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, TIRUVADANAI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUVADANAI POLICE STATION, TIRUVADANAI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.N.PRAGALATHAN Advocate SR.No.18881 PS/PN/SAR-4:10/10/2018:2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17696 of 2018 Date :04/10/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/