K.Pandian v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 05/08/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM K.Pandian ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Karaiyur Police Station, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District In Crime No. 69 of 2019. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.V.Selva, Advocate.
For Respondent : Ms.M.Anantha Devi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 69 of 2019 on the file of the Respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.69 of 2019, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and due to business motive, he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the injured person sustained only simple injury and he has already been discharged from the hospital and hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 3.Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent has submitted that due to business dispute, the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries. Hence, she opposed this petition. However, she fairly 1/3
conceded that the injured person has already been discharged from the hospital.
4.Taking into consideration of the aforesaid facts and also the fact that the injured person sustained only simple injury and he has already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner by imposing certain conditions.
5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] If the petitioners fail to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days, this order shall stand automatically cancelled.
[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required for the interrogation.
[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trail Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trail Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
sd/- 05/08/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
2/3
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMAYAM, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.
2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARAIYUR POLICE STATION, THIRUMAYAM TALUK, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT 4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.10834 of 2019 Date :05/08/2019 VS PK/JC/SAR-4/19.08.2019 : 3P/5C 3/3