Vasanth Kumar, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fifth day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH CRL OP(MD) No.17767 of 2018 VASANTH KUMAR ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.4 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI CITY AND DISTRICT.

(CRIME.NO.28 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.B.JEYAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mrs.M.ANANTHA DEVI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 465, 468 and 471 I.P.C, in Crime No.28 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that A3 approached A1 and A2 and canvassed them for depositing amount in the defacto complainant's Bank. A1 and A2 have deposited the said amount in the name of dead persons and also opened savings bank accounts in their name and thereafter, the matured amount have been transferred and have also withdrawn the same. Hence the complaint. 3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there are totally 4 accused in this case and already A1 to A3 have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court, by an order dated 20.08.2018. This petitioner is the Manager of the said Bank. 4.The learned Government Advocate for the respondent would submit that the respondent police in on the process of investigating the case. This petitioner is arrayed as A4.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. The defacto complainant Bank is directed to freeze the accounts and fixed deposits stand in the name of death persons till the completion of investigation.

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 05/10/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO-I, MADURAI.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI CITY AND DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.B.JEYAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.19036 PS/PN/SAR-4;10/10/2018:2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17767 of 2018 Date :05/10/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/