Madras High CourtWP(MD)/16972/2019disposed of

Ramesh v. The Director Of School Education

2019-08-01Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.08.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.(MD) No.16972 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD) No.13538 of 2019 Ramesh ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Director of School Education, Office of the Director of School Education, Chennai.

2.The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli.

3.The District Educational Officer, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

4.The Correspondent, Seeniammal High School, Chinthamani, Puliyangudi, Sivagangai Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

... Respondents PRAYER : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take immediate action to appoint the petitioner in any school in Tirunelveli District and also to regularize petitioner''s services from the date of surrender by the fourth respondent and pay all monetary benefits thereon within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioners : Mr.A.Sheik Nasuredeen For R1 to R3 : Mr.A.Thiagarajan Government Advocate

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to take immediate action to appoint the petitioner in any school at Tirunelveli District, regularize the petitioner''s services from the date of surrender by the fourth respondent and pay all monetary benefits.

2.Mr.A.Thiagarajan, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that it is suffice, if a direction is issued to the second respondent to consider the petitioners' representation dated 15.03.2019. 4.In reply, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the petitioner's representation dated 15.03.2019 would be considered on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5.In agreement with the submission made by the learned Government Advocate, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.03.

2019 in accordance with law after affording due opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to enclose a copy of this order along with such representation. 6.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

1. The Director of School Education, Office of the Director of School Education, Chennai.

2. The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli.

3. The District Educational Officer, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

+1 CC to Mr.A.SHEIK NASURDEEN, Advocate ( SR-79115[F] dated 01/08/2019 ) +1 CC to SPL GP ( SR-79399[F] dated 02/08/2019 ) W.P.(MD) No.16972 of 2019 01.08.2019 mm MK (13.08.2019) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/