Ponraj v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fifth day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH CRL OP(MD) No.17822 of 2018 1 PONRAJ 2 LATHA 3 ELIZABETH INBARANI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Nos.1,2 &3 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT, (IN CRIME NO. 193 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : Mr.R.PONKARTHIKEYAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.V.NEELAKANDAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 448, 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) I.P.C and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.193 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, due to which, the petitioners assaulted the defacto complainant and criminally intimidated her. Hence the complaint.

3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent would submit that the respondent police investigating the case and the injured has already been discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Satankulam and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two common sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 05/10/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SATHANKULAM 2.DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to MR.R.PONKARTHIKEYAN Advocate SR.No.19045

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17822 of 2018 Date :05/10/2018 LS AE/JC/SAR2/10.10.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/