Madras High CourtWP(MD)/8057/2017partly allowed

K.Karuppasamy v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2017-04-27Honourable Mr Justice N. Authinathan,Honourable Mr Justice A. Selvam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.04.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN W.P(MD)No.8057 of 2017 K.Karuppasamy .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Eriyodu Circle, Eriyodu, Dindigul District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 22.04.2017 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to give adequate Police Protection to the petitioner to conduct the cultural event scheduled to be held on 04.05.2017 particularly Aadalum Padalum dance program on that day in pursuance to the Chithirai Festival of Sri Kaliamman Temple situated in Marambadi Village, Dindigul Disrict.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Vinoth Balan For Respondents : Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, Additional Government Pleader.

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the impugned order dated 22.04.2017 passed by the second respondent and quash the same, by way of issuing a writ of certiorarified mandamus.

2.Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, learned Additional Government Pleader, has taken notice for the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.It is seen from the records that the petitioner has given a representation for the purpose mentioned therein, but the second

respondent has rejected the same by way of passing the impugned order dated 22.04.2017, wherein it has been simply stated that due to law and order problem, permission cannot be granted. The reason assigned by the second respondent cannot be accepted and therefore this Court is inclined to pass the following order. 4.In fine, this writ petition is allowed in part without costs and the impugned order dated 22.04.2017 passed by the second respondent is quashed. The second respondent is directed to look into the representation alleged to have been given by the petitioner afresh and pass suitable orders on merits within a period of two days.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AD-II) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Eriyodu Circle, Eriyodu, Dindigul District.

+1CC to M/S.B.Vinoth Balan, Advocate, SR.No. 54494 +1CC to the Special Government Pleader SR.No. 55248 ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.8057 of 2017 smn AM/SKN/SAR 4/28.04.2017/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/