Rahamathul Kamil Begam v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.02.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Rahamathul Kamil Begam ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate Building, Dindigul District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Office, Dindigul District.

3.The Corporation Commissioner, Office of the Dindigul Municipality, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

4.Ashik 5.Ibrahim Sheriff 6.Boominathan 7.Syllppan ... Respondents PRAYER:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to take necessary action under Section 133 of Cr.P.C., against the respondents 4 to 7 based on the petitioner's representation, dated 24.03.2022 within the time frame fixed by this Court.

1/5

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Balakrishnan For R1 to R3 : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to take necessary action against the respondents 4 to 7 based on the petitioner's representation, dated 24.03.2022 within the time frame fixed by this Court. 2.The petitioner is the owner of the S.M.K.M Complex, Door No.36, Palani Road, Dindigul Corporation, which contains 5 shops. The same was rented to the private respondents. However, the building is in dilapidated condition and it is unsafe to residing, the petitioner has requested the private respondents to vacate the premises. But, they occupied the same as on date. Thereby, she made a complaint before the third respondent. However, no order was passed, this petition has been filed. The learned counsel for the petitioner made a request before this Court that this Court may issue a direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.03.2022. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has no serious objection.

2/5

4.Considering the limited prayer sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is issued a direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 24.03.2022 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.

5.With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Let a copy of the representation be sent along with the order copy to the third respondent to pass orders.

08.02.2024 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No dss 3/5

To 1.The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate Building, Dindigul District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Office, Dindigul District.

3.The Corporation Commissioner, Office of the Dindigul Municipality, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

dss 08.02.2024 5/5