Madras High CourtWP(MD)/18694/2016disposed of

C.Aali Gounder v. The District Collector

2016-09-28Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.09.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Writ Petition (MD) No.18694 of 2016 C.Aali Gounder ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Trichy, Trichy District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri, Trichy District.

3.The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur, Trichy District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to issue patta to the petitioner's house situated in Survey No.125, Re Survey Nos. 200/4 , 200/5 and 200/29 at Ammapatti Village, Thuraiyur Taluk Trichy District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 02.12.2015 within a stipulated time fixed by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Jeyakumaran For Respondent : Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss Government Advocate

ORDER

The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking a direction, directing the respondents to issue patta to the petitioner's house situated in Survey No.125, Re Survey Nos. 200/4 , 200/5 and 200/29 at Ammapatti Village, Thuraiyur Taluk Trichy District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 02.12.2015, within a stipulated time fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 2.According to the petitioner, he filed an application before the second respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer, Trichy District, to amalgamate all the sub-divisions in Survey No.125, Re Survey Nos. 200/4 , 200/5 and 200/29 at Ammapatti Village, Thuraiyur Taluk Trichy District and issue a single patta. The second respondent referred the above application to the third https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

respondent/Tahsildar, Thuraiyur, to conduct an enquiry and pass appropriate orders on 16.12.2015. Sofar, the third respondent did not take any action, pursuant to the order passed by the second respondent. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed. 3.Heard the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents and perused the documents carefully. 4.Since the second respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer has already directed the third respondent/Tahsildar, to conduct an enquiry and pass orders, the third respondent/Tahsildar, Thuraiyur, Trichy District, is directed to conduct an enquiry, as per the direction issued by the second respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer, Trichy District, after issuing notice to the petitioner as well as rival claimants, if any and pass suitable orders on merits and in accordance with Law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Trichy, Trichy District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri, Trichy District.

3.The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur, Trichy District.

+One cc to Mr.J.Jeyakumaran, Advocate, SR.No.56767 +One cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.57022 vs RL/6C/2P/DB/24.10.2016 W.P(MD)No.18694 of 2016 28.09.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/