Sajithu Usain v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Sajithu Usain ... Petitioner versus 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Represented, The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Ramanathapuram District.

3.Hairuan Beevi 4.Abdul Harim 5.Janakiraman ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of writ of mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to conduct the enquiry in the petition dated 03.01.2025 with regard to the forged sale deed in Doc.No.229 of 2023 on the file of the Vellipattinam Sub-Registrar, pending before the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Mahendrarajan For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this court with a grievance that the respondent police have not conducted investigation on his complaint. 2.When this petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor on instructions submits that the petitioner lodged a complaint before the Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram and it was forwarded to the 2nd respondent police. The complaint of the petitioner was registered in CSR No.117 of 2025, enquiry was conducted and the complaint was closed as civil in nature. 3.Recording the above submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. The respondent police shall furnish a copy of the closure report to the petitioner. 20.06.2025 DSK 2/4

To The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Ramanathapuram District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

DSK 20.06.2025 4/4