Subramani v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.02.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.13718 of 2021 Subramani ... Petitioner Vs.

1. State represented through The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

2. The Manager, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank, Ariyakulam Branch, D No.6/104A, 3rd Street, Ground Floor, Teachers Colony, Ariyakulam - 627 011.

... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the 1st respondent to immediately instruct the 2nd respondent to De-freeze the Savings Bank account No.402100050302502 and Fixed Deposit No. 402200050100855, 402200050100856, 402200050100857 and 402200050100858, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank, Ariyakulam Branch and the 2nd respondent to permit the petitioner to access the said accounts.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For R-1 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor For R-2 : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to immediately instruct the 2nd respondent to De-freeze the Savings Bank Account No.402100050302502 and Fixed Deposit Nos.402200050100855, 402200050100856, 402200050100857 and 402200050100858, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank, Ariyakulam Branch and the 2nd respondent to permit the petitioner to access the said accounts.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is an agriculturist and owns both residential and agricultural properties 1/3

at Andipatti Taluk. He is residing with his daughter and son-in-law at Thoothukudi and he is supervising the agricultural operations of the lands of his son-in-law. The petitioner is having account with the second respondent in Savings Bank Account No.402100050302502 and also four fixed deposits under Fixed Deposit Nos.402200050100855, 402200050100856, 402200050100857 and 402200050100858. While being so, the petitioner's son-in-law involved in the case registered in Crime No.18 of 2019 on the file of the first respondent for the alleged offences punishable under Section 420 of IPC and it was registered on 10.09.2019.

3. Pursuant to the said F.I.R, the first respondent arrested the petitioner's son-in-law and remanded to judicial custody. Thereafter, the account of the petitioner including the fixed deposits with the second respondent have been freezed. The same was intimated by the second respondent bank by letter dated 30.04.2021.

4. The only point for consideration is that the first respondent whether violated the procedure as contemplated under Section 102(3) of Cr.P.C.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent would submit that after freezing the savings bank account of the petitioner and also the fixed deposits, the first respondent did not inform the same to the concerned jurisdictional Magistrate Court so far.

6. It is relevant to extract the provisions under Section 102

(3) of Cr.P.C. as follows:

"(3)Every police officer acting under Subsection(1) shall forthwith report the seizure to the Magistrate having jurisdiction and where the property seized is such that it cannot be conveniently transported to the Court, he may give custody thereof to any person on his executing a bond undertaking to produce the property before the Court as and when required and to give effect to the further orders of the Court as to the disposal of the same."

7. Admittedly, the first respondent did not comply the procedure as contemplated under Section 102(3) of Cr.P.C. Therefore, the freeze of the account and fixed deposits have no legs to stand further.

8. Considering the above submission, the first respondent is directed to instruct the second respondent to de-freeze the savings bank account of the petitioner in Savings Bank Account No.402100050302502 and also four fixed deposits under Fixed Deposit Nos.402200050100855, 402200050100856, 402200050100857 and 2/3

402200050100858, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank, Ariyakulam Branch, forthwith. The first respondent is also directed to complete the investigation and file a final report within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

9. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. However, the second respondent is at liberty to freeze the account of the petitioner in manner known to law, if so required, after complying with the procedure as contemplated under law. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (LA&MC) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Lm Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To

1. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.G.PRABHU RAJADURAI, Advocate ( SR-7712[F] dated 22/02/2022 ) Crl.O.P(MD).No.13718 of 2021 21.02.2022 SMV(CO) KB(18.03.2022) 3P 4C 3/3