Madras High CourtWP(MD)/8352/2017disposed of

Subramanian, S/O.Arangan, v. The Joint Director,

2017-04-28Honourable Mr Justice S.S. Sundar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.04.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR W.P.(MD).No.8352 of 2017 Subramanian ..Petitioner Vs.

1. The Joint Director, Department of Primary Education, DPI Complex, Chennai.

2. The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Officer, Pudukottai District.

3. The District Educational Officer, Office of the District Educational Officer, Pudukottai District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to extend the petitioner's deputation period in Poovarasakudi Panchayat Union Middle School by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 24.04.2017 in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Alagumani For Respondents : Mr.C.Selvaraj, Special Government Pleader.

O R D E R

This Writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to extend the petitioner's deputation period in Poovarasakudi Panchayat Union Middle School by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 24.04.2017 in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Mr.C.Selvaraj, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the Writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

4. Though the Writ petition is for issuing a Writ of Mandamus to give a positive direction to the respondents, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 24.04.2017, on merits, within the time stipulated by this Court.

5. Having regard to the limited scope of the prayer that is now sought before this Court by the learned counsel for the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's case, this Court is inclined to issue the following direction:- "The third respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 24.04.2017, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six months from the date of receipt a copy of this order."

6. Accordingly, the Writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Joint Director, Department of Primary Education, DPI Complex, Chennai.

2. The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Officer, Pudukottai District.

3. The District Educational Officer, Office of the District Educational Officer, Pudukottai District.

+1 cc to M/S.SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR.NO:55504 ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD).No.8352 of 2017 28.04.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ PMU SVA/MSA/12.05.2017/SAR4/2P/5C