Sekar @ Rajasekar v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Melur

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 15.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Sekar @ Rajasekar

...Petitioner/Accused

Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep .by The Inspector of Police Melur Police Station Madurai District Crime No.129 of 2026

...Respondent/Complainant

For Petitioner : M/s.S.Prabha For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of Tamil Nadu (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 129 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

1/5

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A7, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 46,296(b), 115(2), 118(1),351(3) and 103(1) of BNS in Crime No. 129 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity all the accused persons abused the defacto complainant in filthy language, assaulted him with wooden log and criminally intimidated with dire consequences and when the defacto complainant's brother who is the deceased came to know about the above incident when questioned the accused persons for which they brutally assaulted him with wooden log and caused his death. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and no previous case is pending against the petitioner. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

2/5

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that due to previous enmity all the accused persons abused the defacto complainant in filthy language, assaulted him with wooden log and criminally intimidated with dire consequences and when the deceased questioned the accused persons for which they brutally assaulted him with wooden log and caused his death. He would further submit that the investigation is not yet completed. Hence, he opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offence and also considering the gravity of offence and also the fact that the investigation is not yet completed, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner at this stage.

7. Hence the petition stands dismissed.

(P D B J) 15.06.2026 aav 3/5

To 1.The Inspector of Police Melur Police Station Madurai District

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

P. DHANABAL, J aav

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No. 10437 of 2026 Date : 15.06.2026 5/5