← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/16663/2025dismissed

Isaac Arul v. The District Registrar

2025-06-23Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Isaac Arul ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Registrar, Kanniyakumari District at Nagarcoil, Kanniyakumari District.

2. The Sub Registrar,, Kotaram, Kanniyakumari District.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Kanniyakumari District at Nagarcoil, Kanniyakumari District.

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kanniyakuamri District at Nagarcoil, Kanniyakumari District.

5. The Inspector of Police,, Souththamaraikulam Police Station, Kanniyakumari District.

... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to take necessary steps to comply the direction issued by the first Respondent vide proceeding No.375/M3/2023, dated 03.04.2025 and proceeding No.375/M3/2023 1/4

dated 12.06.2023, within stipulated time may be fixed by this Court, which is pending on his file.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Suresh Kumar For R-1 & 2 : Mr.G.Suriya Ananth Additional Government Pleader For R-3 to 5 : Mrs.M.Aasha Government Advocate (Crl. side)

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to take necessary steps to comply the direction issued by the first Respondent, dated 03.04.2025 and dated 12.06.2023.

2. The petitioner has preferred a complaint against one Esakiappan, who is an employee in the office of the Sub Registrar, Kottaram. The said complaint was acted upon and the higher authorities have initiated proceedings against Esakiappan. Now, the petitioner is seeking further action based on the proceedings issued by the first respondent.

3. It is seen that the petitioner is a third party to the disciplinary proceedings. It is a settled proposition of law that a third party cannot seek remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to take disciplinary action 2/4

against a government employee. Therefore, the present writ petition is a frivolous litigation.

4. With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

23.06.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes jbr To:

1. The District Registrar, Kanniyakumari District at Nagarcoil, Kanniyakumari District.

2. The Sub Registrar,, Kotaram, Kanniyakumari District.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Kanniyakumari District at Nagarcoil, Kanniyakumari District.

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kanniyakuamri District at Nagarcoil, Kanniyakumari District.

5. The Inspector of Police,, Souththamaraikulam Police Station, Kanniyakumari District.

3/4

S.SRIMATHY , J.

jbr ORDER MADE IN DATED : 23.06.2025 4/4