Madras High CourtWP(MD)/8527/2017dismissed

Vetrikumar v. The District Collector

2017-04-28Honourable Mr Justice V. Parthiban2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.04.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P(MD)No.8527 of 2017 Vetrikumar ..Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Office District Collector, Madurai.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Office of District Revenue Officer, Madurai.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai.

4.The Thasildhar, Office of Thasildhar, Vadipatti, Madurai District.

5.Meyappan @ Iyyappan ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.12.2016 and to all the respondents to take appropriate action against the illegal occupier of petitioner's 3 cents of land allotted to his grandfather vide proceedings Na.Ka.No.A.1444/59 dated 30.09.1962 by the Special Tahsildar (L.A) Adi Dravidar Welfare Unit - I, Madurai.

For Petitioner :Mr.R.Senthil Kumar For Respondents 1 to 4 :Mr.D.Muruganantham Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.12.2016 and to direct the respondents to take appropriate action against the illegal occupier of petitioner's 3 cents of land allotted to his grandfather vide proceedings Na.Ka.No.A.1444/59 dated 30.09.1962 by the Special Tahsildar (L.A) Adi Dravidar Welfare Unit - I, Madurai.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.Heard Mr.R.Senthilkumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.D.Muruganandham, the learned Additional

Government Pleader for the respondents.

3.The prayer in the writ petition is too generic in nature and the same cannot be granted by this Court by exercising its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. If the petitioner has any grievance as against the 5th respondent or any third party regarding the relief prayed for, he has to approach the appropriate Court. Invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India straightaway is misconceived and not maintainable. 4.Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AD II ) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Office District Collector, Madurai.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Office of District Revenue Officer, Madurai.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai.

4.The Thasildhar, Office of Thasildhar, Vadipatti, Madurai District.

+1cc to M/S THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR.NO. 55368 +1cc to Mr.R.Senthilkumar,Advocate,SR.54893 W.P(MD)No.8527 of 2017 28.04.2017 SJ kk/RSK/09.05.2017-2P-7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/