Madhan v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep.. By The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 08/06/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Madhan ... Petitioner/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep.. By, The Inspector of Police, Chinnadharapuram Police Station, Karur District.

(Crime No. 76 of 2026).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.J.Alexander, For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.76 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. 1/6

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.05.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS in Crime No. 76 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that there was a dispute between the parties. On that motive, during the temple festival on 12.05.2026 at about 07.50 a.m., the accused persons scolded the defacto complainant with filthy language, assaulted him with hands and billhook. Hence the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Injured was discharged from the hospital. The petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.05.2026. Therefore, prayed to grant bail for the petitioner. 2/6

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that based on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant, the case has been registered against the accused persons. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and the offences are grave in nature and hence, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6.Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, the nature of the offence and the fact that there was a dispute between the parties during the temple festival and further considering the fact the injured was discharged from the hospital, as well as the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees 3/6

Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Aravakurichi, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with 4/6

law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(P D B J) 08.06.2026 PNM TO

1. The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Aravakurichi

2. Do-Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karur District.

3. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Karur.

4. The Inspector of Police, Chinnadharapuram Police Station, Karur District.

5. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

P. DHANABAL,J PNM

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10302 of 2026 Date : 08/06/2026 6/6