← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/16800/2021disposed of

Kishore Baiju.A v. The District Collector

2022-10-27Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan,Honourable Mr Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.10.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD and W.M.P(MD)No.13682 of 2021 A.Kishore Baiju ... Petitioner vs.

1.The District Collector, Nagercoil, 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanabhapuram, 3.The Tahsildar, Kalkulam Taluk, 4.The Executive Engineer, Nagercoil, 1/6

5.The Assistant Executive Engineer, 6.The Executive Officer, Kothanalloor Town Panchayat, Chemparuthivilai, 7.Gregori 8.Amalajaya 9.Johnrose ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 6 to remove the encroachment made in R.S.No.197/27, Kathanalloor Village, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District, by the respondents 7 to 9 herein, along Travancore Canal Poramboke and thereby remove the superstructure made by the respondents 7 to 9 herein in the abovesaid land forthwith.

For petitioner : Mr.C.Kishore For RR 1 to 6 : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate For R - 7 : Mr.D.Senthil Kumar For RR 8 & 9 : No appearance

ORDER

2/6

(Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.) The prayer in this Writ Petition is for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 6 to remove the encroachment made in R.S.No.197/27, Kathanalloor Village, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District, by the respondents 7 to 9, along Travancore Canal Poramboke and thereby remove the superstructure made by the respondents 7 to 9 in the abovesaid land forthwith.

2.The main allegation in this Writ Petition is that the respondents 1 to 6 failed to remove the encroachments made by the respondents 7 to 9, despite several representations. Hence, this Writ Petition.

3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 6, on instructions, submitted that necessary enquiry and survey would be conducted, appropriate action will be taken to remove the encroachment, if any, after giving notice and sufficient opportunity to all the parties concerned and by due process of law.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the seventh respondent 3/6

submitted that opportunity must be provided to the seventh respondent for filing necessary documentary evidences and also his objection.

5. Recording the abovesaid submissions, the authorities concerned are directed to conduct a survey of the place in question in the presence of all the parties, after due notice. If the survey revealed any encroachment as claimed by the petitioner, the authorities concerned shall take necessary action for removal of such encroachment, after affording sufficient opportunity of personal hearing to all the parties concerned and by following due process of law, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [R.M.D.,J.] [J.S.N.P.,J.] Index : Yes / No 27.10.2022 Internet : Yes ps To 4/6

1.The District Collector, Nagercoil, 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanabhapuram, 3.The Tahsildar, Kalkulam Taluk, 4.The Executive Engineer, Nagercoil, 5.The Assistant Executive Engineer, 6.The Executive Officer, Kothanalloor Town Panchayat, Chemparuthivilai, 5/6

R.MAHADEVAN ,J.

and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.

ps ORDER MADE IN DATED : 27.10.2022 6/6