Madras High CourtWP(MD)/8619/2017dismissed

K.R.C. Energy Pvt. Ltd., v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

2017-04-28Honourable Mr Justice V. Parthiban2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.04.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P(MD)No.8619 of 2017 and WMP (MD) Nos.6538 and 6539 of 2017 K.R.C. Energy Private Limited, Represented by its Director, K.Ramakrishnan, Son of M.Kumarasamy, No.127, Thalavapalayam Main Road, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District.

..Petitioner Vs 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Revenue Tahsildar, Tuticorin.

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Umarikkottai Village, Tuticorin District.

4.Jeganathan 5.J.Muthusamy ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned patta proceedings of the 2nd respondent in respect of Patta No.2616 quash the same and consequently directing the 2nd respondent to restore the Patta No.2283 exclusively in the name of the petitioner as earlier.

For Petitioner :Mr.S.Karthik For Respondents 1 to 3 :Mr.M.Alagathevan Special Government Pleader

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking quashment of the impugned patta proceedings of the 2nd respondent in respect of Patta No.2616 and consequently to direct the 2nd respondent to restore the Patta No.2283 exclusively in the name of the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.As against the proceedings of the second respondent, there is an effective alternative remedy. Without exhausting the said

effective appeal remedy available under the statue, the petitioner has invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of the of Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

3.In that view of the matter, the writ petition is not maintainable as effective alternative remedy is available. Therefore, the Writ Petition fails and the same is dismissed. As against the order of the second respondent, it is open to the of the petitioner to approach the 1st respondent, if he is so advised. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Protocol) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Revenue Tahsildar, Tuticorin.

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Umarikkottai Village, Tuticorin District.

+One cc to M/s.S.Karthik, Advocate, SR.No.54963 sj RL/5C/2P/SV/17.5.2017 W.P(MD)No.8619 of 2017 and WMP (MD) Nos.6538 and 6539 of 2017 28.04.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/