← Library
Madras High CourtWP Crl.(MD)/2999/2026disposed of

Paraman v. The State Of Tamilnadu, Rep. Through The Superintendent Of Police,

2026-06-09Honourable Mrs Justice L.Victoria Gowri4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.06.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Paraman ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. through the Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District.

2. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. through the Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o.Deputy Superintendent of Police, Aundipatty Sub-Division, Theni District.

3. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep By the Inspector of Police, Aundipatti Police Station, Aundipatty Taluk, Theni District.

4. Adaikan ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose petitioner's complaint dated 15.04.2026 by considering the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.21 of 2010 on the file of the Learned District Munsif - 1/4

cum - Judicial Magistrate Aundipatty, dated 17.07.2013 within a time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.Ramasiva For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy (R1 to R3) Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose petitioner's complaint dated 15.04.2026 by considering the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.21 of 2010 on the file of the Learned District Munsif - cum - Judicial Magistrate Aundipatty, dated 17.07.2013 within a time stipulated by this Court.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforesaid suit seeking permanent injunction not to disturb the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property has been decreed in favour of the petitioner. However, the fourth respondent and his men are harassing the petitioner. In this regard, the petitioner lodged a complaint. However, no proper action was taken, and therefore, this petition was filed. 2/4

3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police submitted that the enquiry is pending.

4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials before this Court. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the fourth respondent, notice to him is dispensed with.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the third respondent police is directed to consider the petitioner's complaint dated 15.04.2026 and conduct an enquiry in this regard, after issuing summons to the parties concerned, under Section 64 of the BNSS, and conclude the same, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. This writ petition is disposed with the above directions. 09.06.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No sm 3/4

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

Sm TO:-

1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o.Deputy Superintendent of Police, Aundipatty Sub-Division, Theni District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Aundipatti Police Station, Aundipatty Taluk, Theni District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Order made in Dated 09.06.2026 4/4