← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/13849/2022dismissed

S.Arockiyasamy v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2022-08-01Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.13849 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 01/08/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN CRL OP(MD). No.13849 of 2022 S.Arockiyasamy ... Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs The State Rep. By, The Sub Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station, Musiri, Trichy District.

Crime No.226 of 2022.

... Respondent For Petitioner : M/s.Arumugam C.M, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.226 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC, in Crime No.226 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the first accused and the petitioner are close relatives and the petitioner by showing the first accused's photo stated that he is working in District Collector Office (DROJ) and received more than Rs.9,00,000/- for obtaining Government Job from the general public including the defacto complainant also. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent persons and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.13849 of 2022

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submitted that on 01.07.2022, the first accused appeared before the Deputy Superintendent Of Police and gave a statement against the petitioner.

5.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the confession statement cannot be taken as evidence against the petitioner at all. He would further submit that he appeared before the District Crime Branch and gave a cheque to the tune of Rs.6,50,000/- on behalf of the petitioner by accepting liability.

6. Taking into consideration the allegations and also gravity of the offence committed by this petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 01/08/2022 / TRUE COPY / /08/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUSIRI POLICE STATION, MUSIRI, TRICHY DISTRICT.

2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.C.M.ARUMUGAM, Advocate ( SR-8041[I] dated 02/08/2022 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.13849 of 2022 Date :01/08/2022 tta USK/PN/SAR-II/25.08.2022/2P/4C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2