Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14491/2020allowed

Maruthamani v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-12-11Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14491 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14491 of 2020 1.Maruthamani 2.Ramakrishnamoorthy 3.Maruthapandi 4.Madankumar 5.Velmaruthu 6.Dharmalingam 7.Linga Selvam 8.Maheswaran 9.Minor P.Arumugakadavul 10.Maruthuselvam 11.Manivannan 12.Poovalingam 13.Minor G.Nallamanidoss 14.Maruthu 15.Dharmar 16.Minor S.Maruthaselvam 17.Minor R.Maruthukarthikeyan 18.Maruthuraja ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Kallikudi Police Station, Madurai District.

(Crime No.1581 of 2020) ...1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Kannan ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the impugned first information report in Crime No.1581 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same as against the petitioners are concerned.

For Petitioners : Mr.C.Jeganathan For R1 : Mr.V.Neelakandan, Additional Public Prosecutor.

For R2 : Mr.Satheesh Kumar

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the First Information Report in crime No.1581 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent police.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14491 of 2020 2.The second respondent / defacto complainant, as well as the petitioners/accused are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter has been amicably resolved between themselves and the second respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the complaint and therefore, the petitioners would pray for quashing the FIR in Crime No.1581 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent police. 3.The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties along with their respective counsel are also personally present before this Court today(11.12.2020) and the defacto complainant has represented before this Court that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor who was present in the Court had also verified their identity and would state that he has no objection for the above compromise.

4.In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the FIR in Crime No.1581 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent police, is quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ENCL.: XEROX COPY OF JOINT COMPROMISE MEMO.

gns Note In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

To 1.The Inspector of Police, Kallikudi Police Station, Madurai District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14491 of 2020 11.12.2020 ES(CO) TR(07.01.2021) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2