Madras High CourtWP(MD)/19544/2016disposed of

M.Sundarapandian, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2018-10-05Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.10.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD)No.19544 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD)No.14100 of 2016 M.Sundarapandian ...

Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary, Home (Police V) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Chennai.

3.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services, Recruitment Board, No.4, 9th Cross Street, Indira Nagar, Adayar, Chennai - 20.

...

Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order Endt.Rc.No.154154/Rect.II (I)/2014, dated 31.08.2016 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to fix the seniority of the petitioner in the appropriate place in the list of candidates selected for appointment as Sub Inspector of Police for the year 1997 - 1998 and disburse all service and monetary benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Chellapandian For Respondents : Mr.R.Sethuraman, Spl.G.P.

O R D E R

The petitioner has come forward with the present Writ petition to quash the impugned order Endt.Rc.No.154154/Rect.II(I)/2014, dated 31.08.2016 passed by the 2nd respondent and consequently direct the respondents to fix the seniority of the petitioner in the appropriate place in the list of candidates selected for appointment as Sub Inspector of Police for the year 1997 - 1998 and disburse all https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

service and monetary benefits.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3.When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has filed a Review Petition on 06.08.2018 and thus he restricts the prayer to the extent that the Review Petition may be considered and orders passed thereon in accordance with law.

4.Since the petitioner has restricted the relief to the extent of disposal of the Review Petition, the respondents are directed to dispose of the Review Petition within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar() /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) nbj To 1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Home (Police V) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Chennai.

3.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services, Recruitment Board, No.4, 9th Cross Street, Indira Nagar, Adayar, Chennai - 20.

+1cc to Mr.S.Chellapandian, Advocate in SR No.89046 +1cc to The Spl Government Pleader, SR No.89132 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ W.P.(MD)No.19544 of 2016 NM/SKN/SAR IV/31.10.18/2P/6C