Kosamattan Finance Company Limited v. The Commissioner Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.13808 and 14540 of 2021 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13808 of 2021:
Kosamattam Finance Company Limited, Rep by its, Branch Manager, K.Pudur Branch, Mr.P.Thangapandi, S/o.P.Pitchai Having its Branch Office at No.1, Karpagavinayagarkovil 4th Street, ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Alagarkovil Main Road, 2.The Inspector of Police (Crime), E1, K.Pudur Police Station, 3.Vasantha Inspector of Police, E1, K.Pudur Police Station, 4.C.Mohamed Yasin
...Respondents/ Complainant
Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent No.3 not to interfere into the civil dispute between the Kosamattam Finance Company and the respondent No.4.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Malaikani For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi No.1 & 2 Additional Public Prosecutor 1/3
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14540 of 2021:
Kosamattam Finance Company Limited, Rep by its, Branch Manager, K.Pudur Branch, Mr.P.Thangapandi, S/o.P.Pitchai Having its Branch Office at No.1, Karpagavinayagarkovil 4th Street,
...Petitioner
Vs
1. The Inspector of Police(Crime), E1,K.Pudur Police Station, ... Respondent No.1./ Complainant 2.C.Mohamed Yasin
...Respondent/ Respondent No.2/
Defacto Complainant Prayer : This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records connected with summon in C.S.R.No.588 of 2021 pending on the file of the respondent police and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioner: Mr.S.Malaikani For R1 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor COMMON ORDER Crl.O.,P(MD) No.13808 of 2021 has been filed to direct the third not to interfere into the civil dispute between the Kosamattam Finance Company and the fourth respondent and Crl.O.P(MD) No.14540 of 2021 has been filed to call for the entire records connected with summon in C.S.R.No.588 of 2021 pending on the file of the respondent police and quash the same as illegal.
2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, petition enquiry was conducted and the same was closed. The said submission is recorded.
3. It is made clear, now that the complaint has been closed, the respondent police shall not call the petitioner in the guise of enquiry and harass him.
2/3
4.With the above observation, these Criminal Original Petitions are closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar To:
1.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Alagarkovil Main Road, 2.The Inspector of Police (Crime), E1, K.Pudur Police Station,
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.13808 and 14540 of 2021 08.02.2022 cp MS/22.02.2022/3P.4C 3/3