Senthilkumar v. The Sub Registrar

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.06.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Senthilkumar

...Petitioner

vs.

The Sub Registrar, O/o.Sub Registrars Office, Kulithalai, Karur District.

...Respondent

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus thereby directing the respondent to register the Settlement Deed in TP/247022762/2026, dated 30.01.2026, within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Saravanan For Respondent : Mr.R.Parthiban, Government Standing Counsel

ORDER

The Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus directing the respondent to register the Settlement Deed created on 30.01.2026, presented by the petitioner vide token in TP/247022762/2026.

1/4

2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the document is kept pending unnecessarily without process or orders being passed.

3. The learned Government Standing counsel appearing for the respondent, on instructions, would submit that what is annexed in the type set of papers and mentioned in the prayer is only the token number. Even though token was generated, the document is not presented with the respondent.

4. In view thereof, without going into the question whether the petitioner actually presented the document or not, the issue can be resolved by the following order:- (i) On 15.06.2026, the petitioner can present this document before the respondent / Sub Registrar, Kulithalai, Karur District, at 10:30 AM and upon presentation, the same shall be received and dealt with in the manner known to law.

(ii) Parties to act on the web copy of the order.

5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 2/4

04.06.2026 NCC : No mbi To The Sub Registrar, O/o.Sub Registrars Office, Kulithalai, Karur District.

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

3/4

mbi 04.06.2026 4/4