K.Saravana Kumar v. The Director Of Municipal Administration
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.07.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA W.P.(MD) No.16120 of 2024 K.Saravana Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Director of Municipal Administration, O/o. the Director of Municipal Administration, Chennai - 28.
2. The Commissioner of Municipality, Keelakarai Municipality, Ramanathapuram District.
... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No.2 to revoke the suspension of the petitioner by considering the representation sent by the petitioner, dated 10.04.2024 1/6
in the light of the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No. 81 Human Resources Management (N) Department dated 04.08.2022. For Petitioners : Mr.T.Aswin Raja Simman For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel - for R1 Government Advocate Mr.K.Saravanan - for R2 Standing Counsel
ORDER
Heard Mr.T.Aswin Raja Simman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.S.Shanmugavel, learned Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent and Mr.K.Saravanan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent
2. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.
3. The petitioner who has been kept under suspension on 09.01.2024 has filed this writ petition seeking direction to consider his 2/6
representation to revoke the suspension.
4. The petitioner has been kept under suspension in view of a criminal case pending against him under Section 7A of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
5. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that so far no charge memo has been furnished to him and the mandates of the position of law settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ajaykumar Chowdry's case to be followed and the petitioner's suspension is liable to be set aside.
6. The learned Government Advocate for the first respondent submitted that the petitioner has involved in a serious offence of getting bribe and hence, the case cannot be considered so leniently.
7. Whatever may be the reason, the respondents ought to have considered the representation of the petitioner and pass orders on 3/6
merits. Since no order has been passed, the petitioner has approached this Court.
8. In view of the above reasons, this writ petition is disposed of and the respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 10.04.2024 in the light of the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No. 81 Human Resources Management (N) Department dated 04.08.2022 and pass orders within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 19.07.2024 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No RM 4/6
To
1. The Director of Municipal Administration, O/o. the Director of Municipal Administration, Chennai - 28.
2. The Commissioner of Municipality, Keelakarai Municipality, Ramanathapuram District.
5/6
R.N.MANJULA , J.
RM Order made in W.P.(MD)No.16120 of 2024 19.07.2024 6/6