Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9134/2017disposed of

Selvaraj, v. The Director General

2017-05-18Honourable Mr Justice M.V. Muralidaran2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.05.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN W.P(MD)No.9134 of 2017 Selvaraj : Petitioner Vs.

1.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Road, Chennai - 2.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy.

3.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Ponmalai, Trichy.

4.The Inspector of Police, Airport Police Station, Trichy.

: Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to take appropriate action based on the petitioner's representation dated 10.05.2017 within a time frame fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Anbarasu For Respondents : Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss, Government Advocate.

O R D E R

The Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to take appropriate action based on the petitioner's representation dated 10.05.2017.

2.Heard Mr.D.Anbarasu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss, learned Government Advocate, who takes notice for the respondents. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is running a Courier company and due to business motive, the vehicle of the petitioner was intercepted and kidnapped by some unknown persons and a sum of Rs.85,000/- was also also robbed by them. A complaint was also given to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

respondent police and the respondent police is not acting in accordance with law.

Therefore, the petitioner made a representation to the respondents 1 and 2. But, the same has not been considered so far. Therefore the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition.

4.After some elaborate arguments, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that it would suffice if the representation of the petitioner is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, within the time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5.Considering the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the (*)Second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 10.05.2017, conduct enquiry and act in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CSII) (*)PARAGRAPH 5 OF THE ORDER DATED 18.5.2017 MADE IN WP(MD)NO.9134/2017 IS MODIFIED AS PER ORDER DATED 30.5.2017 UNDER THE CAPTION OF "BEING MENTIONED"

Sub-Assistant Registrar To (*)TO BE SUBSTITUTED IN THE ORDER ALREADY DESPATCHED ON 29.5.2017 1.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Road, Chennai - 2.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy.

3.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Ponmalai, Trichy.

4.The Inspector of Police, Airport Police Station, Trichy.

+One cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.56982 +One cc to M/s.D.Anbarasu, Advocate, SR.No.56892 smn JS/KP/SAR1/29.5.2017 MAS/JC/SAR4/6.6.2017/7C/2P ORDER MADE IN https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ W.P(MD)No.9134 of 2017 18.05.2017